Thursday, April 21, 2005

Put On Your Tinfoil Hats

Holy smoke, this is the black helicopter crew getting prime real estate in the "news." Check this out. This pretty much answers it. It's just amazing to me that when these guys find something to be the root of all evil they are willing to go to any length to get there! This is the opposite of their favorite, blame America first phrase. How does the Faux network continue to have any credibility when they do stuff like this that is at its very best, overwhelmingly questionable? Sheeple. This is America and Americans can do no wrong. Shine up those rose colored glasses.

Delay & Kennedy

Radical Republican Tom Delay thinks Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy is not fit to serve. Let's remember Kennedy was nominated by a conservative Republican and was approved by the senate for a lifetime term. This is just one more sign that the right has gone off the deep end. What's his complaint?

We've got Justice Kennedy writing decisions based upon international law, not the Constitution of the United States? That's just outrageous," DeLay told Fox News Radio on Tuesday. "And not only that, but he said in session that he does his own research on the Internet? That is just incredibly outrageous."

The bill he is speaking of is the death penalty applied to children. That is a separate issue and I may or may not agree with Kennedy. Do I want the law of America based on laws somewhere else instead of the Constitution. No. However when discussing cruel and unusual punishment one must decide what would be unusual. Nuff said, if you can't figure it out from there you are a lost cause anyway. Using the internet for research? How dare he do what CEOs college professors, students, house and senate members, business people, well hell, everybody with access, does! How lame can you get. Once again, they have NOTHING so they make stuff up.

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Coffee Table

More non stop religon in the news. I haven't much to say about it. I believe in freedom of religon and keeping it out of government to help it stay that way. I'm not a catholic so I haven't much to say. They can do what they want, I have little interest. Time to give you a chance to discuss what's important to you. The coffee is hot. Sit down and to quote Mr. S. : Be who you are, say what you feel. Those that mind don't matter and those that matter don't mind.

Monday, April 18, 2005

The Right Christians

You know, if the Christian movement was more like this I could feel comfortable and happy with them. Right now frankly they are scaring the hell out of me. Which, by the way, what's the deal with turning the filibuster debate into a religious issue. The clear inference here is if you are against ending the filibuster you are anti-god. That these nominees are going down because of their "faith". Which particular "faith" is being discriminated against. What is the "faith" of those voting pro or con. I would bet you have many different ones on both sides. As it should be, but won't be for long if the American Taliban gets to determine whether your "faith" is the right kind or not. Will these people stop at nothing!? And where did we go wrong in this country that so many sheeple and freepers fall for this idiocy. Just say its the liberal media or liberal bias, that's good enough. A mind to narrow to measure.

Sunday, April 17, 2005

Is It Possible...

The radical right talkers were talking out of their ass again?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/04/15/schiavo.report/index.html
Sheeple.....Wake up!!!!!!

Opps, Another Lie

To bad the "liberal media" didn't want to tell America. Oh I forgot it's OK cuz it wasn't "under oath."
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,12875384^1702,00.html

Maybe if they wouldn't have insisted the intelligence come from a lying alcoholic because he said what they wanted to hear it would have worked better.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-curveball1apr01,0,959265.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The "Liberal Media" Strikes Again

Hater Posted by Hello


The damned "liberal media" . Doesn't it just frost your butt? What does this lady have to do with anything that relates to reality, politics or news beyond incitement to hate on a constant basis?
Update:
I couldn't find this at the time but here it is. My favorite Anne..if she says it believe it ...Coulter
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/video_player.html?coulter_clip&playerType=wmp

Update again!
Anne says the photo is unflattering and they did it on purpose cuz she's a conservative! That damned liberal media!

Fireable Offense

I often talk to Clinton haters who say..."What gets me is if I would have done what Clinton did I would be fired." Good enough...Now let's see what else one might get fired for.

Let's say I said "We have a severe threat to our company. As painful as it may be we must spend huge amounts of the shareholders money and cost some lives to insure the survival of the company". Then as it turns out I was far off the mark. Would I get away with blaming it on my staffers or would my job as the head of the company be at stake? What if this copious amount of money I spent helped lead to a huge debt for the company. Should I be reviered as a great leader? What if, during this time I decided to give a raise to my highest payed employees and key shareholders and a few peanuts to the others?( The top 1/5th of earners receive 2/3rds of all benefits and the bill excluded extending the child tax credit to 4 million low income families who do not qualify. Middle class earners will receive an average cut of $162 in 2005.
Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 04.14.04 )
I said this was going to increase production and profits but it didn't. Should I be held blameless? Now let's say I said our new health care problem was going to cost X but later we find out I knew all along it would be 25% higher. Should we dismiss this lie because it wasn't under oath? Or maybe just blame the problem on underlings again?
I think you get the idea. And I could go on and on..maybe you would like to add a few of your own. The question is should I or would I keep my job? Why is it different now. All the rules have changed after 9/11. SOOOOOO convenient!