Just watching the Fox cartoon(news) network. The conversation was on the damn justice stopping democrats. They, apparently, should go back to how its been done for 220 years. The guest gave an explanation that I didn't get at all. I think because it was non-senseical. Then, whoever the hostlady was made me laugh out loud with her ignorance. Honestly. It was hilarious! She said something to the effect of -The people voted and Frist is the leader of the MAJORITY. Shouldn't we the people pretty much go along with the majority.? BWA HAHAHAHAHA !
It appears it's Paige Hopkins. Page can read and knows how to do her hair but apparently was writing notes during civics class.
First, most obviously, one party rule with no opposition would be dictatorship.
: a form of government in which absolute power is concentrated in a dictator or a small clique b : a government organization or group in which absolute power is so concentrated.
We do not...yet...live in a dictatorship. Built in the Constitution is separation of powers and rights for the minority. Those minority rights are there to form a barrier to a radical agenda by either side without the deliberate and cautionary moving of the wheels of law and justice. We all know deep down inside that many, many peoples view on this would be exactly reversed if the shoe was on the other foot.
Calling this the "Constitutional Option" is a misnomer. It's certainly not along the lines of the Constitutional separation of powers. I have heard the pundits say this is not a big deal to most Americans. To bad because this is a huge deal to the theocrats. They want judges on the court that will interpret mans laws in terms of Gods law. This is unfortunate because I am afraid that their understanding of God varies from mine ...and many other peoples for that matter.
Wait......maybe that's why we have separation of church and state!
It's all so sick. The conversation in the mainstream media doesn't exist...to the extent that on Fox it's purely cartoon news....... a ludicrously simplistic, unrealistic, or one-dimensional portrayal or version.