Anne Coulter
A rare case of honesty from Miss Anne here. It is an audio file so it will take a few seconds to load but worth it. Damned liberal media!!!!!
The only thing we have to fear is fear its self. Nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror
A rare case of honesty from Miss Anne here. It is an audio file so it will take a few seconds to load but worth it. Damned liberal media!!!!!
17 Comments:
Can we get the whole clip to see what she really said...but that would be just like liberals to pick out a few words here and there and say it is fact...next, quote the New York Times editoral page as factual info...if you do have the whole clip of her talking, I would like to see what she is actually talking about...
I know from the 4 seconds she talks it sounds like she is saying the media is concervative, but since I have read every one of her books, I know she does not believe that.
also, check out my blog, new fun pictures added
Game: My prophetisim streak continues. I knew that would be your response. I am sorry you have read all her books. Any chance she writes those books to make money and maybe even propaganzise. Thomas Paine she aint. One thing I didn't get that I was hoping for from you. Give me your theories on what she REALLY ment to say. What else might she have been saying besides "we have the media". Don't just roll the dice, use your noggin! :-)
I don't know what she meant to say, I want to know what she actually did say...
I hope you have read her books before you talk trash about them...
I think you would start bleeding from the nose if you read "slander" It is just as good as "Bias" in showing with actual examples how the media slants the news. They don't do it on purpose, but when almost all of them are liberals, they just think their way of thinking is normal and balanced.
no e in Ann
sorry about the e. Guess I decided right away she wasn't one to keep up on much. I can give you actual examples for anything. Have you seen outfoxed?
Was she a lawyer or something? I'm not sure what here "rant" qualifications are. I guess deep thinker or something.
By the way, like the pics on your blog..
thanks about the pics comment...
I do not know what outfoxed is...
Right now on her web site, surprise, www.anncoulter.com, she is going crazy about how much she hates Bush's supremem court pick...
You know, I've stayed out of this for too long...
but that would be just like liberals to pick out a few words here and there and say it is fact...
Now, isn't that calling the kettle black...
It's the first thing the conservative neocons are good at, especially in propagandizing.
Illiteracy along with brainwashing being second. How can anyone who supports this administration talk when it comes to taking a few words here and there? We all know what the favorite few words are... "Evil", "Evil-doers", "war in Iraq=good for America", and a few more buzz words that are constantly being drilled into our heads, without giving us the real agenda, or the real facts of WHY.
I'm afraid to go to your blog, dude, am afraid it would be just too dangerous, without the real McCoy.
I don't know where to begin...
saying evil=doers has nothing to do with someone playing a clip of someone saying something for 3 seconds. There is no way to argue gibberish.
How is it difficult to understand that I would like to hear an entire arguement. I have never quoted half of someones sentence...I have never posted a link and left out half the link...
that is what I think has happened here. I can not lower the grade level thinking on this...
The point to my comment was your comment to what I quoted you on. Not necessarily directly on the article itself.
If you want to make a point about something that you feel the full information has been left out of, you don't do it by calling the kettle black. Period. As I stated, I have heard very little "real information" coming from the neocons, other than their buzz words used to brainwash the public; however, I have found loads of information on the other side of the coin, and not just from liberals.
Get a grip. You know what the point of what i said was. You can't dispute that, either --
BTW: I'm sure that someone as smart as yourself is perfectly capable of hunting down the full transcripts of what was said, or some audio clip *somewhere*.
DUH.
I guess I am not...
Guess you got some learning to do then --
It's called "the media".
you find it for me then...if it is so easy...
You're the one complaining, and leaving useless sources (if any) on your own "points", "facts", etc. You learn to research -- really research, and to think of where those sources you're researching at are coming from; learn to research and look at things in an unbiased manner, and draw your conclusions from that, not from just what you want to.
I've posted more than my fair share, here, and in other places as well. I've made my points, backed them up with more than credible, known, legitimate sources (which you don't even so much as recognize? Good god, you been in a cocoon, boy! But that's okay, that's right where the neocons want you).
I'll go you one better:
Let's put you on assignment, and send you off to find a real, credible, known-by-most source, to refute anything that Ron has said in his original post here.
Now, this oughta be interesting...
Oh yeah, newsmax should cut it. LMAO.
Nope, sorry...
Don't forget to back up anything you put here with other sources... as in, more than one lame one.
Post a Comment
<< Home