A Week Of Comments

It's All New For You!!!!!


InfiniteOddyssey said...
ok now here is something I found what is up with all theses charities look at them all in alphabetacal order , now how can all these be charities and the People are still displaced with no money??? Link Its beyond me!!!!

Ron said...
I have been thinking about this "black" issue concerning Katrina. I honestly don't think it had to do with color and I am starting to wonder if it's about poor people. Now, I tell you I am not a conspiracy theorist but something doesn't smell right here. I heard a LA. congressman talk about how the Gov. called a state of emergency and prepared. The President issued an emergency proclimation and FEMA moved into place. The storm hit and nothing. He was mistifed at what the holdup was because everything was in place. I have heard and read this in other places too. Now I'm not saying this is what is going on but isn't it interesting that things only got better when we got the military involved. Hmmmmmmmmmm


The Game said...
Is being conservative a crime? It seems that over the years judges have to prove to democratic senators that they are not "too conservative."Why is it a crime to have conservative values, mainly believing that the law should be interpreted. It has been the argument that judges are allowed to advance liberal belief systems and agenda from the bench.Why is it when a Democrat nominates a very liberal Supreme Court justice Republicans vote them in, because the American people voted in a Democrat, meaning at the time the American people agree with that persons philosophy.Well, GWB has won two elections, and the house and senate have won seats since 1994. It seems very clearly that the American people are thinking more on the right side for the last 11 plus years. So why does Judge Robert's face so much scrutiny?He has been given the highest rating by the ABA.Votes of Judges:William H. Rehnquist (nominated by a republican) 1971 vote...68-26John Paul Stevens (republican) 1975 vote...98-0Sandra Day O'Connor (republican) 1981 vote...99-0Antonin Scalia (republican) 1986 vote....98-0Anthony Kennedy (republican) 1987... 97-0David Souter (republican) 1990 vote...90-9Clarence Thomas (republican) 1991 vote...52-48 (democrats still controlled senate)Ruth Bader Ginsburg (democrat) 1993 vote....96-3Stephen G. Breyer (democrat) 1994 vote... 87-9Okay...answer a few questions...What happened between Scalia and now? How can the senate go from a 98-0 vote on a definite conservative, to probably a 70-30 vote on a moderate?answer is....Liberals know this is all they have left...this is the only way they can get their agenda passed...How does a far left liberal get confirmed 96-3? Republicans know the American people elected Clinton, so he gets to choose who he wants...Why do judges get attacked on being strict constructionists of the constitution? Since liberals hate that mind set, does that mean their way of thinking (activist judges) is the only way to think? Does that make liberals "tolerant?"


Ron said...
Game, It is not a crime to be a conservative. It's a crime to be a thiefing neo-con PNACer. Frankly I watched a little a lunch yesterday and found him to appear capable with a good knowledge of the law. He states he is in favor of the right to privacy and individual liberty. If he acts in that way on the bench then it will be alright with me. He is getting grilled because that is the duty of the loyal opposition..you know both sides of the story? Sorry you haven't figured out this democracy thing. What changed between Scalia and now is that the conservatives have been hijacked by corporate industrialists who have not only all the power but money too. That tends to make some of us a bit uncomfortable.

DemoCat said...
Re: the comments made on the show recently on abuse of prisoners in the County penal system.I don't have a lot of sympathy for MOST criminals, but I agree that there need to be minimum standards. (What! Should our jails be like Abu Ghraib?) There's no excuse for there to be cockroaches, for games to be played with temperature controls, for medications to be denied, etc. What is wrong with hugging a male inmate? Don't these guys deserve a little human contact and compassion? Maybe it would help inspire their rehabilitative efforts. A hug isn't a conjugal visit, for God's sake!My understanding is that EVERYTHING must be purchased through the jail/prison commissary at grossly inflated prices. Family members must send/bring in cash to inmates who can't even get a magazine or a change of underwear from home. Come on!!No one's saying they should have color TVs in every cell Ron, or be served filet mignon or lobster for dinner. They're not going to work ALL day and should have a TV in the lounge, a library, tutoring, arts and crafts, counseling, decent medical care, etc. Denying them these things will not rehabilitate them and is more likely to result in jail/prison riots.Besides that, SOME of the people in jail are innocent and have not even gone to trial yet. Many of them are in for possession of pot (those of us who smoked it in our hippie days could have gone to jail, Ron, and that means you, too). Should they be treated worse than dogs in the pound? I don't think so and Jesus urged his followers to visit people in prisons and to be kind to them, so we know where He stood on prisoner abuse.

The Donkey said...
The Donkey's tax dollars paid for yesterday’s Pentagon-sponsored September 11 memorial walk and concert called "Freedom Walk,". The freedom did not extend to the news media or any American's who desired to exercise free speach.The Donkey is surprized that the American trying to enlist people did not get arrested. Maybe tomorrow.

Anonymous said...
it like calling a liberal a retard a tad redundant i know

The Donkey said...
It is now clear that a challenge on this scale requires greater federal authority and a broader role for the armed forces, the institution of our government most capable of massive logistical operations on a moment's notice.The Donkey can not find fault with this statement. Will this be an excuse to take away guns from citizens? US marshalls, directing US military illegaly took away peoples guns. They also illegaly entered private propery and took people out of their homes. It is true that local and state police did the same thing. Why did Bush let this happen?

Ron said...
Oklahoma? I know they would hate it if donkeys could talk.

The Game said...
hey ron...I know you come to my blog...or maybe others who live in your town...why don't you comment..oh, and my blog is in the semi-finals for blog of the year...humor me and votego to my blog for the link